Opt out while you can
honestly cannot understand why people on this page have a problem understanding
that MY ORGANS belong to me by default. If someone said they could do with
your CAR as they pleased you would have no problem saying "You cannot - it
belongs to me, and the law protects my right to own my property" - how much
moreseo then do I own my own organs that I was born with?
This is an inalienable RIGHT that the government are trying to overturn -who do they think they are?
If they tried to say "Your personal property is the government's until you opt out" - you'd be livid. What kind of idiots cannot understand that?
This is a basic liberty that is being undermined - are people so stupid and so emotionally bent out of shape that they think "letting people die is a criminal offence"? What about the thousands of creatures they kill to eat the meat of - is that not criminal? Clearly these people have not thought it through. Or are animals our lessers - think so?
|People die all the time - that is their NATURAL state of affairs
- it is only mankind and his ability to manipulate nature that has made it
so we can even donate organs - THIS IS NOT THE NATURAL STATE OF AFFAIRS -
the default is - MY ORGANS ARE MINE to do with as I please - and if I donate
them - it is MY privilege.
Or are they property - and should the government allow you to opt out
of that one too? Use your brain people ,and stop pretending that you via
Big Brother own my body until I say you don't.
Would those people who think an opt-out organ donation system is fair,think it fair that the government should own and decide what to do with all their personal property like their car until they say otherwise? Do they think it right that a government should tell a pregnant woman whether she can carry a baby to full term or not? No? Why? Because everyone has a right to do with their own things as they wish - that is what a democracy protects. And if they own their own car - how much moreso do I own my own body? A criminal offence to leave people to die? - perhaps not in the case of the opt-outers - I'd sooner be rid of people who cannot see why I have liberty over my own body.
Mr Hammet thinks my organs are intestate. He is using a law which justifies state stealing as an analogy to show how opt out is viable. The point is that being intestate and the state purloining your goods is just WHY opting IN is the only option. The state has no right to either my goods or my organs,by default,the fact that they nick my goods upon death doesn't make the principle correct,it merely indicates that they have already eroded my rights,and shows exactly why they should not be allowed to own my organs by default.
May I remind C Simpson that this planet is suffering from overpopulation,and saving everyone who needs an organ only adds to the problem. In the case of George Best,and others who do not take care of what is given them,why should I allow the government to use my organs on habitual drinkers who have no desire to look after themselves or the planet? It is they who are selfish. What I do with my organs is my business,it is not the business of the government anymore than what happens to my property.
Random- Previous- Next- List- Join